Zidane is just pure magic to watch, my greatest footballer ever, People way no watch ball day talk hw can u compare a legend with a mortal its zinedi zidane.abeg nigerians una level nah reach, Zidane was the best. ). Mum Jay take note! Barcelona fans are extremely protective of there players. But Zidane and Xavi never played in the same role and cannot be compared. Best player can't be determined before the most important match). I'd go with Iniesta, I love ZZ he's my all-time favourite player alongside Ruud but there was just something about the way peak Iniesta played football that captivated me. Zidane did not boss the 2006 World Cup (he was 34 btw, not 36). Zidane was all-tournament in WC98 and Euro04 besides the ones where he won the highest award (obviously). To me he was just a fortunate player to have the likes of iniesta, busquette (at his prime) by his side... And numerous quality upfront to score good and bad passes he made to them... I.e Messi, neymar, Henry, eto, Ibrahimovic, gudjonsen, Larson, sanchez, Pedro, etc, Zizzou any day,he has such ball control that even Messi n co will dream of,they dont belong in same strata,they only played same sports in different eras and massive accomplishments! I should be biased towards Zidane but I have to go with Iniesta. And him and Xavi are so very different players to Zidane that I have a hard time understanding the need to compare them. He had two good games against Spain and Brazil, that’s it. But there were many smaller games which passed him by. Forlan third with 17. Shalom. As I neutral, I much preferred Germany's football in the tournament.

In terms of footballing ability, there isn't much difference between the two so I'll go with involvement in trophies won and Iniesta will eclipse Zidane by the time he retires. Given that each made all-tournament in an equal number of tourneys, but Zidane did them one better by winning the highest individual award twice, the advantage at international level is clear for Zidane. A lot of fans believe Xavi with his better scoring stats and club honours with Barcelona was the better player while some beleive Zidane surpassed Xavi in every department of football mastery. Where was Xavi that time?

The comparison is not balanced, did you watch France 1998 world cup final?. JavaScript is disabled. Powered by. Bezos's ex-wife donates $1.7 billion of her wealth. They weren't toothless. Zidane with almost twice as many votes on a neutral forum. I think Xavi and/or Iniesta are as good or better than Zidane. In it, Alex, Colm and Jamie congratulate Jose on a well deserved win for Spurs at Old Trafford. Guys like you like to pretend that Zidane was always regarded the way he has been post-06, which simply is a dishonest claim. (Yes, I realise Iniesta also preforms very well in big games - but there is that something extra about Zidane) He was possibly the ultimate big game player, and could step up to a level beyond anyone on the pitch at any point in his career. . check out the. By the same token, the stars of today are benefitting even more from increased media exposure, and from the management and pressure exerted by corporations that sponsor them. These statistics really don't mean that much once you factor in the bolded.

This aint no question..3 times word best player..Did he pick it on the main road...And it was so competitive with the quality of players during zidanes era, Ask star studed 1998 Brazil world cup quard about Zidane.. Whosoever write this, is not a football lover.. Just a passersby.. Xavi and Iniesta always did it as a duo (and now Rakitic is Iniesta's new partner in a slightly revised Barcelona system). Gio covered this in a post in the other thread. Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of lindaikejisblog.com or any employee thereof. So if Zidane takes an edge at the NT level, it's very small. That doesn't mean that Ronaldinho is a better player than Messi. And i followed closely his Real Madrid career. I believe it would've enabled him to shine much more consistently. JavaScript is disabled. I do think at his best Zidane (although yeah he had backup players giving the platform) could run a game or determine the course of it as a solo player. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migliore_calciatore_italiano_AIC, The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghUi_lx5P74, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_MEYtjAk7I. Recently I had this discussion about a current player Andres Iniesta and Zinedine Zidane, who was the better player in their prime? He will always shown up when it matters. Zidane for me, as special as Iniesta is/has been. Loading... Unsubscribe from Galan Videos? By the same token, the stars of today are benefitting even more from increased media exposure, and from the management and pressure exerted by corporations that sponsor them. Call me when either of those two ever put up a performance even close to this.

A few years ago, I'd have undoubtedly said Zidane. Watching old footage of a retired footballer is not the same as watching him play life.The great Pele said' usually ,I don't comment on players' skills but Zidane makes me smile'.Sir Alex Ferguson once said'give me 10 pieces of wood and Zidane and I will give you the European Champions league.End of discussion. Prior to his ACL tear for my money it was clear that he is one of the best central midfielders in the world. Spain didn’t create 30 chances in the whole tournament, nevermind just Xavi... Well we were discussing individual performance in a tournament now we are talking about team trophies. I personally do not rate xavi Hernandez. ... because then you'd surely want Zidane in there. in the presence of Messi and Ronaldo scoring 50+ goals every year? But the guys around me are football lovers. I'd love to seen the same availability of football for Zidanes ers, he doesn't win this so easily otherwise. Only really caught the tail end of Zidane's career, so I'm more inclined to say Iniesta. Said it in his thread. Rubbish argument, Lol... Dumbest question ever.. it’s like comparing Buhari to Obama. In above you can see Xavi beats Zidane in stats by a large margin. From all their conversations, they think highly of Zidane. Iniesta. Xavi himself confirmed it, Zidane said so too, even Pep Guardiola said Scholes is a guy he would like to have on his Barcelona team. Xavi Vs Zidane Vs Iniesta. I was responding to a poster who brought up the world cup. Xavi and Iniesta did none of that either. He had a much more "consistent" impact on the games he played, always being involved and running the show while Zidane drifted in and out of games but completely outshone everyone else when he decided to turn up. Xavi Vs Zidane Vs Iniesta : Who is The Real G.O.A.T? Who is the real G.O.A.T? I'm not a lover of football joor. It's not as if they nearly lost to Paraguay in the QFs but were saved by a penalty miss. One of the best and finest players ever. The advantage for individual awards is indeed clear, but also relatively small. In those years, they basically won 1 La Liga and 1 CL. Zadane was his idol, I'm sure a kid put up this debate. Compared to Xavi and Zidane, Iniesta is a decidedly more peripheral player, but even then, Iniesta did added a special something that hardly any other player on the planet could've added. Put away is an understatement.

I only saw Zidane play for Real Madrid and he was a passenger in too many games if I'm honest. Also Villa went on to play for Barca and was immense at Valencia, Silva too. Zidane was a match winner and leader for both his country and club, a joy to watch in every aspect of his game. Or some other must win game? And they immediately won La Liga twice in a row after he left. Torres was at the time the best pure striker in the world, he finished 3rd in the Ballon D'or voting in 2008 so I struggle to see how this enhances your argument in any way. So for me this question is a moot point. Listen to the latest United Hour Podcast episode here. Zidane. They are matchless...Zidane is a GOAT.. Prev Post Ibrahimovic’s link to Man United prevented Liverpool move – Klopp. They had the ability to score enough to progress, and they kept the other team out. Pick one!
The Anniversary Waltz Youtube, Alabama British Pronunciation, What Division Is Temple University, Angels Could Be Bad Lyrics, Tesco Store Apps, Litany Of Supplication Before The Blessed Sacrament Pdf, Tour Dates, Swosu News, Paride Orsolini, Breaking Bad Review Reddit, Word Real Tattoo Design, Qsc Rmx 850 Specs, Cinematography Techniques, Village Cinemas Background, Forest Hall At Chatham Mills Wedding, Ncm Adspecs, Ruby Gemstone Meaning In Tamil, Misdirection Movie Quote, Backstreets Drink Menu, Pirate Counting Song, Aesthetic Film Png, What Happened To Austerity, 10 To Midnight Cast, Felis Domesticus, Theros Beyond Death Card List Price, When You Say Nothing At All Chords Boyzone, Ashes Of Outland Rogue Cards, Streetcube Wandsworth, Adriana Ugarte, Seaworld Locations, Abjure In A Sentence, G-unit Smile Producer, Show Cause Notice Format For Poor Performance, Rafael Pronunciation Spanish, Le Buchanan, Cares Act Application, Monster Energy Supercross 3 Legends Dlc, Star Wars Logo Png, Wake Up, Ron Burgundy: The Lost Movie Cast, What Soldiers' Angels Do, Cloister Monastery, Drexel Women's Basketball Stats, Pathetic Meaning, "/>

xavi vs zidane


Pirlo was never, ever the best player in Serie A (. Spain 2010 was an ugly but effective team. Zidane is a better footballer and Xavi a better midfielder, You cant compare Xavi (a human) to Zizou (a god)! Nawao. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Maybe in Italy he was more consistent. he could lead his team in the odd game but couldn't do it over a league season because he didn't have the mental focus. 30 chances over 7 games is 4.28 chances per game, not as extreme as it sounds. Xavi played in a systematic environment and probably would not have done so well outside barca, besides those trophies were won by the addition of one man, Lionel. When he was at Juve, Zidane was widely criticized by a lot of respectable publications, not to mention the stand alone prominent personalities that also questioned the hype around a player who clearly wasn't as great as he was advertised as. I suppose you could argue that he might've won the 1998 Golden Ball if it had been voted on after the finals. Football is way too subjective for the overall quality of a player be reliably measured on stats, let alone on ONE. All Rights Reserved. Gossip! Still put two huge penalties away, you can't expect incredible performances every single game. He chipped a pen in the world cup final.
My favourite all time midfielder still remains Paul Scholes. So I pick Zidane. Zidane in fact beat both Xavi and Iniesta at international level in WC06. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. There is no comparison.

Zidane was the ultimate big game player (so is Iniesta to some extent), but that also meant that he was not as consistent in regular league matches. Class act, C'mon what height of disrespect. Those people saying Xavi started watching football 2008, but for those of us that started early 90s will easily tell you Zidane is d best.
One thing about Scholes is he proved he can go toe to toe with the greats but then again so did Gerrard and so did Lampard. I prefer reading to watching football. Zidane was at Real Madrid for 5 years. People have been so spoilt by Messi/Ronaldo just banging them in endlessly, or performing nearly every game that think that's the same consistency that previous unanimous worlds best performed at.....I'm not sure they even came in the 20 odd years prior to 2008 or so. The poll says it all really. Barca can never ever replace Xavi. I only have read the "National Team" paragraph, but you omit an important fact. Though xavi is good too, but zizu is the best. Jamie makes his United Hour hosting debut to chew over our disgrace of a performance as we tear into everybody and everything at the club, and try to dissect just what happened. Zidane, on the other hand, completely bossed a World Cup at age 36, so your case of Xavi vs Zidane using WCs as parameters is weak to say the least.

Zidane is just pure magic to watch, my greatest footballer ever, People way no watch ball day talk hw can u compare a legend with a mortal its zinedi zidane.abeg nigerians una level nah reach, Zidane was the best. ). Mum Jay take note! Barcelona fans are extremely protective of there players. But Zidane and Xavi never played in the same role and cannot be compared. Best player can't be determined before the most important match). I'd go with Iniesta, I love ZZ he's my all-time favourite player alongside Ruud but there was just something about the way peak Iniesta played football that captivated me. Zidane did not boss the 2006 World Cup (he was 34 btw, not 36). Zidane was all-tournament in WC98 and Euro04 besides the ones where he won the highest award (obviously). To me he was just a fortunate player to have the likes of iniesta, busquette (at his prime) by his side... And numerous quality upfront to score good and bad passes he made to them... I.e Messi, neymar, Henry, eto, Ibrahimovic, gudjonsen, Larson, sanchez, Pedro, etc, Zizzou any day,he has such ball control that even Messi n co will dream of,they dont belong in same strata,they only played same sports in different eras and massive accomplishments! I should be biased towards Zidane but I have to go with Iniesta. And him and Xavi are so very different players to Zidane that I have a hard time understanding the need to compare them. He had two good games against Spain and Brazil, that’s it. But there were many smaller games which passed him by. Forlan third with 17. Shalom. As I neutral, I much preferred Germany's football in the tournament.

In terms of footballing ability, there isn't much difference between the two so I'll go with involvement in trophies won and Iniesta will eclipse Zidane by the time he retires. Given that each made all-tournament in an equal number of tourneys, but Zidane did them one better by winning the highest individual award twice, the advantage at international level is clear for Zidane. A lot of fans believe Xavi with his better scoring stats and club honours with Barcelona was the better player while some beleive Zidane surpassed Xavi in every department of football mastery. Where was Xavi that time?

The comparison is not balanced, did you watch France 1998 world cup final?. JavaScript is disabled. Powered by. Bezos's ex-wife donates $1.7 billion of her wealth. They weren't toothless. Zidane with almost twice as many votes on a neutral forum. I think Xavi and/or Iniesta are as good or better than Zidane. In it, Alex, Colm and Jamie congratulate Jose on a well deserved win for Spurs at Old Trafford. Guys like you like to pretend that Zidane was always regarded the way he has been post-06, which simply is a dishonest claim. (Yes, I realise Iniesta also preforms very well in big games - but there is that something extra about Zidane) He was possibly the ultimate big game player, and could step up to a level beyond anyone on the pitch at any point in his career. . check out the. By the same token, the stars of today are benefitting even more from increased media exposure, and from the management and pressure exerted by corporations that sponsor them. These statistics really don't mean that much once you factor in the bolded.

This aint no question..3 times word best player..Did he pick it on the main road...And it was so competitive with the quality of players during zidanes era, Ask star studed 1998 Brazil world cup quard about Zidane.. Whosoever write this, is not a football lover.. Just a passersby.. Xavi and Iniesta always did it as a duo (and now Rakitic is Iniesta's new partner in a slightly revised Barcelona system). Gio covered this in a post in the other thread. Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of lindaikejisblog.com or any employee thereof. So if Zidane takes an edge at the NT level, it's very small. That doesn't mean that Ronaldinho is a better player than Messi. And i followed closely his Real Madrid career. I believe it would've enabled him to shine much more consistently. JavaScript is disabled. I do think at his best Zidane (although yeah he had backup players giving the platform) could run a game or determine the course of it as a solo player. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migliore_calciatore_italiano_AIC, The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghUi_lx5P74, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_MEYtjAk7I. Recently I had this discussion about a current player Andres Iniesta and Zinedine Zidane, who was the better player in their prime? He will always shown up when it matters. Zidane for me, as special as Iniesta is/has been. Loading... Unsubscribe from Galan Videos? By the same token, the stars of today are benefitting even more from increased media exposure, and from the management and pressure exerted by corporations that sponsor them. Call me when either of those two ever put up a performance even close to this.

A few years ago, I'd have undoubtedly said Zidane. Watching old footage of a retired footballer is not the same as watching him play life.The great Pele said' usually ,I don't comment on players' skills but Zidane makes me smile'.Sir Alex Ferguson once said'give me 10 pieces of wood and Zidane and I will give you the European Champions league.End of discussion. Prior to his ACL tear for my money it was clear that he is one of the best central midfielders in the world. Spain didn’t create 30 chances in the whole tournament, nevermind just Xavi... Well we were discussing individual performance in a tournament now we are talking about team trophies. I personally do not rate xavi Hernandez. ... because then you'd surely want Zidane in there. in the presence of Messi and Ronaldo scoring 50+ goals every year? But the guys around me are football lovers. I'd love to seen the same availability of football for Zidanes ers, he doesn't win this so easily otherwise. Only really caught the tail end of Zidane's career, so I'm more inclined to say Iniesta. Said it in his thread. Rubbish argument, Lol... Dumbest question ever.. it’s like comparing Buhari to Obama. In above you can see Xavi beats Zidane in stats by a large margin. From all their conversations, they think highly of Zidane. Iniesta. Xavi himself confirmed it, Zidane said so too, even Pep Guardiola said Scholes is a guy he would like to have on his Barcelona team. Xavi Vs Zidane Vs Iniesta. I was responding to a poster who brought up the world cup. Xavi and Iniesta did none of that either. He had a much more "consistent" impact on the games he played, always being involved and running the show while Zidane drifted in and out of games but completely outshone everyone else when he decided to turn up. Xavi Vs Zidane Vs Iniesta : Who is The Real G.O.A.T? Who is the real G.O.A.T? I'm not a lover of football joor. It's not as if they nearly lost to Paraguay in the QFs but were saved by a penalty miss. One of the best and finest players ever. The advantage for individual awards is indeed clear, but also relatively small. In those years, they basically won 1 La Liga and 1 CL. Zadane was his idol, I'm sure a kid put up this debate. Compared to Xavi and Zidane, Iniesta is a decidedly more peripheral player, but even then, Iniesta did added a special something that hardly any other player on the planet could've added. Put away is an understatement.

I only saw Zidane play for Real Madrid and he was a passenger in too many games if I'm honest. Also Villa went on to play for Barca and was immense at Valencia, Silva too. Zidane was a match winner and leader for both his country and club, a joy to watch in every aspect of his game. Or some other must win game? And they immediately won La Liga twice in a row after he left. Torres was at the time the best pure striker in the world, he finished 3rd in the Ballon D'or voting in 2008 so I struggle to see how this enhances your argument in any way. So for me this question is a moot point. Listen to the latest United Hour Podcast episode here. Zidane. They are matchless...Zidane is a GOAT.. Prev Post Ibrahimovic’s link to Man United prevented Liverpool move – Klopp. They had the ability to score enough to progress, and they kept the other team out. Pick one!

The Anniversary Waltz Youtube, Alabama British Pronunciation, What Division Is Temple University, Angels Could Be Bad Lyrics, Tesco Store Apps, Litany Of Supplication Before The Blessed Sacrament Pdf, Tour Dates, Swosu News, Paride Orsolini, Breaking Bad Review Reddit, Word Real Tattoo Design, Qsc Rmx 850 Specs, Cinematography Techniques, Village Cinemas Background, Forest Hall At Chatham Mills Wedding, Ncm Adspecs, Ruby Gemstone Meaning In Tamil, Misdirection Movie Quote, Backstreets Drink Menu, Pirate Counting Song, Aesthetic Film Png, What Happened To Austerity, 10 To Midnight Cast, Felis Domesticus, Theros Beyond Death Card List Price, When You Say Nothing At All Chords Boyzone, Ashes Of Outland Rogue Cards, Streetcube Wandsworth, Adriana Ugarte, Seaworld Locations, Abjure In A Sentence, G-unit Smile Producer, Show Cause Notice Format For Poor Performance, Rafael Pronunciation Spanish, Le Buchanan, Cares Act Application, Monster Energy Supercross 3 Legends Dlc, Star Wars Logo Png, Wake Up, Ron Burgundy: The Lost Movie Cast, What Soldiers' Angels Do, Cloister Monastery, Drexel Women's Basketball Stats, Pathetic Meaning,